XM vs FOREX.com: a $5 entry ticket vs a US-regulated heavyweight
FOREX.com (4.4) beats XM (4.1) on trust, platforms, and markets, and it takes US clients. XM wins on a $5 minimum. Where you live decides first.
Advertiser disclosure: we may earn a commission if you open an account through links on this page. It never changes our ratings or which broker we say is the better fit — see how we rate.
Bottom line: US and Canadian traders can't open XM, so FOREX.com is the answer by default. Outside North America, FOREX.com is the stronger broker on regulation, platforms, and range, while XM only wins if a $5 starting balance is the thing that matters most, and its big deposit bonus shouldn't be what tips you.
XM vs FOREX.com: a $5 entry ticket vs a US-regulated heavyweight: side by side
| XM | FOREX.com | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Category | Forex & CFDs | Forex & CFDs |
| Minimum deposit | $5 | $100 |
| Fees | Spread-based; very low $5 minimum | Spread or commission pricing; ~$100 minimum |
| Tradable assets | Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, Metals | Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, Futures |
| Regulated by | CySEC, ASIC, FSC | CFTC, NFA, FCA, ASIC |
| Asset protection | — | — |
| Founded | 2009 | 2001 |
| Current offer | Up to $5,000 | — |
Category scores
| Rated on | XM | FOREX.com |
|---|---|---|
| Fees & value | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Platform & tools | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Tradable assets & markets | 4.1 | 4.4 |
| Regulation & trust | 4.0 | 4.6 |
| Support & experience | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Overall | 4.1 | 4.4 |
Scores are our editorial assessment on a 0–5 scale — see how we rate.
This comparison splits on geography before it gets to price. XM doesn’t accept clients from the US or Canada. FOREX.com is regulated by the CFTC and NFA and does. If you’re a US trader, you already have your answer, and what follows explains why it’s also the stronger broker for most people who do have a choice.
Outside North America it’s a real matchup between two different products. FOREX.com scores 4.4 in our forex & CFD category and scores higher in all five of our categories, by the widest margin on trust. XM scores 4.1 and has one clear advantage: a $5 minimum deposit, about as low as the category goes. So the question isn’t which broker is better. FOREX.com is. The question is whether your situation makes the low entry point worth giving up the rest.
Neither broker pays us. There’s no affiliate link on either side of this page.
What everyone compares vs. what actually matters
Most XM vs FOREX.com searches are about the bonus and the minimum deposit. Those are the two numbers least likely to matter six months in. What does matter:
Legal access. XM is off the table in the US and Canada. FOREX.com is one of the largest forex brokers serving US traders.
Which entity holds your account. Both brokers run several regulated entities, and your protections come from the one you’re onboarded under. With FOREX.com that’s typically a CFTC/NFA, FCA, or ASIC entity. With XM the licenses range from CySEC in Cyprus to offshore bodies such as the FSC (Belize) and FSA (Seychelles). That spread is the biggest single gap between these brokers.
Which account you open. Both offer a spread-only account and a commission account with tighter spreads. At either one, if you trade often, the commission account is usually the better deal.
Cost: XM to start, FOREX.com to trade
The published numbers:
- Minimum deposit: XM $5 on Standard and Micro accounts; its raw-spread XM Zero account needs about $100. FOREX.com about $100, with a suggested $1,000 to trade comfortably.
- Account structure: XM Standard and Micro are spread-only with no commission; XM Zero pairs tighter spreads with a commission. FOREX.com runs a spread-only Standard account and a RAW Spread account at about $7 per $100k traded.
- Inactivity: FOREX.com charges an inactivity fee after a dormant period.
The $5 minimum is XM’s real headline, and for someone who wants to test a live account with pocket money, nothing on FOREX.com matches it. But entry cost is paid once and trading cost is paid on every position. On that side we score FOREX.com 4.3 and XM 4.2. Close enough that your own pairs and session times will decide it more than our score will. FOREX.com publishes a concrete RAW commission, and our XM review doesn’t cite a comparable Zero-account figure, so check it on XM’s site before comparing like for like. Edge: XM on entry cost, roughly even on trading cost.
Platforms and tools: FOREX.com
XM runs on MetaTrader 4 and 5 across desktop, web, and mobile, backed by a large library of beginner education. It’s capable and familiar, not differentiated. FOREX.com also supports MT4 and MT5, and adds TradingView and its own well-developed web and mobile platform with strong charting and research. That’s a 4.5 platform score to XM’s 4.2. If you want to chart in TradingView or prefer a native platform over MetaTrader, only one of these gives you that. Edge: FOREX.com.
What you can trade: FOREX.com, narrowly
Both are forex-first brokers. XM covers forex plus CFDs on indices, commodities, metals, and shares. FOREX.com covers a deep spot-forex lineup plus CFDs on indices and commodities by region, with futures available through its StoneX parent. US clients at FOREX.com trade spot forex (and, via StoneX, futures), not CFDs. We score assets 4.4 to 4.1. Neither is a stock-and-fund investing account. Edge: FOREX.com.
Regulation and trust: FOREX.com, clearly
This is the widest gap on the page: 4.6 vs 4.0.
FOREX.com is regulated by the CFTC/NFA in the US, the FCA in the UK, and ASIC in Australia, and it’s owned by StoneX Group (NASDAQ: SNEX). A public parent means audited financials and public accountability behind the brand. It has operated since 2001.
XM, founded in 2009, is overseen by 13 regulators across 10+ countries, with CySEC as its main European license. The breadth is real, but the mix leans offshore compared with the FCA/ASIC-anchored top tier, and a trader onboarded under a Belize or Seychelles entity gets materially weaker protection than one under CySEC. If you pick XM, confirm which entity you’re signing up with before you deposit. US spot-forex accounts at FOREX.com are not SIPC-covered the way securities accounts are. Edge: FOREX.com.
Support: roughly even
XM’s support is a genuine strength of the brand: multilingual, responsive, and staffed for a large global retail base, with fast onboarding. FOREX.com’s support is solid across the usual channels with strong educational resources. We score it 4.2 to XM’s 4.0, a small gap. Non-English speakers may find XM’s multilingual coverage matters more than that number suggests. Edge: FOREX.com on score, XM on language coverage.
The bonus question
XM advertises up to $5,000, and it’s the loudest number in this comparison. Read what it is: non-withdrawable trading credit. It’s structured as 50% on your first deposit up to $500 of credit, then 20% on further deposits up to $4,500 of credit. You’d need to deposit well into five figures to earn the headline amount. It isn’t available to US, Canadian, or other excluded clients, or on XM’s Ultra Low or Shares accounts. XM sets the terms and they change, so check its promotions page before you rely on any of it.
FOREX.com offers no deposit bonus. US clients are ineligible for retail bonuses under CFTC/NFA rules, and its prior offshore offer expired in June 2026. Extra margin credit on a leveraged account mainly lets you take bigger positions. It shouldn’t pick your broker for you.
Who should pick which
Choose FOREX.com if you live in the US or Canada, where XM isn’t available. Outside North America, choose it if you want top-tier regulation and a public-company parent, TradingView or a proprietary platform alongside MetaTrader, or access to futures. Open the RAW Spread account if you trade actively, and mind the inactivity fee if you don’t.
Choose XM if you’re outside North America, want to start with a very small live balance, and value multilingual support. Confirm which regulated entity you’re onboarded under, prefer the CySEC entity where you can, and treat the bonus as credit, not money.
Avoid both if you want to invest in stocks and funds rather than trade leveraged forex and CFDs, or you haven’t worked out how quickly leverage can wipe out an account. Most retail CFD accounts lose money. US traders weighing FOREX.com against another US-regulated option can read OANDA vs FOREX.com, and how we rate explains the category scores behind these numbers.
Bottom line
FOREX.com is the better broker. It has stronger regulation, a public parent in StoneX, more platforms, and wider market access, and it’s the only one of the two a US trader can open. XM’s case rests on accessibility: a $5 minimum, strong multilingual support, and a bonus that looks bigger than it is. That’s a fair entry point for a non-US beginner who confirms their regulatory entity first. Anyone planning to trade seriously should start with FOREX.com, test fills on a demo, and size positions knowing that leverage works against you as fast as it works for you.
Frequently asked questions
Can US traders use XM or FOREX.com?
Only FOREX.com. It is regulated by the CFTC and NFA and accepts US clients for spot forex. XM does not accept clients from the US, Canada, or several other countries, so for a US trader the comparison ends there.
Which is cheaper, XM or FOREX.com?
XM is cheaper to start: a $5 minimum deposit on its Standard and Micro accounts versus about $100 at FOREX.com (which suggests $1,000 to trade comfortably). On ongoing trading costs it's closer. FOREX.com's RAW Spread account charges about $7 per $100k traded with tighter spreads, and we score its fees 4.3 to XM's 4.2. FOREX.com charges an inactivity fee after a dormant period. Compare your own pairs on demo accounts before funding.
Is XM's up-to-$5,000 bonus worth it?
Treat it carefully. It's non-withdrawable trading credit, not cash: 50% on the first deposit up to $500 of credit, then 20% on further deposits up to $4,500. It isn't available to US, Canadian, or other excluded clients, or on XM's Ultra Low or Shares accounts. FOREX.com offers no deposit bonus; US clients are ineligible for retail bonuses under CFTC/NFA rules.
Is XM or FOREX.com safer?
FOREX.com scores higher on trust, 4.6 to XM's 4.0. It is regulated by the CFTC/NFA, FCA, and ASIC and owned by NASDAQ-listed StoneX Group. XM holds CySEC and other licenses, but its regulatory mix skews toward offshore jurisdictions such as Belize's FSC. At both, protections depend on the entity you're onboarded under, and leverage carries a high risk of loss.